Thermal Depolymerization
Before I wrote this column I had already started collecting information on TDP. It’s still a decent starting place for learning more. Check out http://www.kantor.com/useful/thermo.shtml.
* * *
Follow-Ups
A few people have written to be asking the same (or a similar question) regarding the efficiency of the TDP process.
Specifically: How much energy is used to power it? Does it use more energy to process the animal/medical/industrial waste than it gets back in oil? (If so, that would make TDP a terrific waste-disposal system, but not a good energy producer.)
Jason Preiser was the first to question this. He wrote:
(to convert the waste), I recover 85 BTUs worth of energy.
This turns out not to be the case. According to the company, about 15 percent of the fuel that comes out of a TDP plant is used to power the plant itself — the other 85 percent is new energy. So if a TDP plant generated 100,000 BTUs worth of oil, it would only use about 15,000 BTUs to power the process.
According to Changing Worlds’ Terry Adams:
(For you purists, he does point out that “Turkey offal is not really a good fuel so the ‘100 Btu’s in’ is only a theoretical value.”)
He also wrote:
A couple of people also questioned TDPs efficiency in terms of the laws of physics — you know, energy cannot be created or destroyed. One was Mark Ellison who wrote, “It takes energy to turn garbage into oil using TDP, and, of course, the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics tells us that the energy content of the oil so obtained will be less than the energy used to create it.”
Create, yes. But the energy in, say, turkey offal is created when the animals eat and drink. It’s stored in their bodies. The energy content of the oil obtained through TDP is less than or equal to the energy used to to create it (e.g., turkey food and water), but greater than the energy used to extract it. That’s what makes it an exciting energy source.
The bottom line: TDP produces more energy from the garbage that’s thrown into the ‘hopper’ than is used to power the process.











Bryan says:
I am glad to see that someone other than me is as excited about this process as I was when I received my May ‘03 issue of Discover. When I told people about this, thay reacted with the same ho-hum attitude that the Segway received. This is the greatest invention since sliced bread! Yet, people don’t seem to comprehend the impact this will have. It solves a plethora of problems all at once. Environmental, political(oil issues), economical, etc. It provides a possibility of cleaning up waste sites. The possibilities are practically endless. And the most amusing part is the that nay-sayers are nay-saying based on a miscomprehension of the math(the BTU in vs. out issue). I am just glad to see there are people out there who can appreciate the beauty of this new, or rather, re-invented science.