Understanding Electron “Clouds”

Published 12/28/04

Bohr Model of the atom

Most people have seen what’s called the Bohr model of the atom (’cause it was described by Niels Bohr) — it’s the nucleus with some electrons in orbit around it. (That’s an example on the right.)

Anyway, that model is wrong. It has been since the early 1900s. Well, it’s been wrong since the Big Bang, but we’ve known it was wrong since the 1900s.

A more accurate model would show the electrons as a ‘cloud’ around the nucleus. That’s because, in part, of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle which says that we can never know both where an electron is and where it’s going. So physicists think of a ‘cloud of probability’ — an area in which the electron is in all places at all times.

Huh? In other words, until that electron interacts with something — another atom’s electrons, or a human tester — it’s everywhere in that space. As soon as we observe it, it exists in a single place. But when we’re not looking, it’s everywhere.

That’s a pretty cool concept, but a tough one to grasp. As I was lying in bed I realized a good analogy: a fan.

a fan

Imagine a desk fan whirling away. You can’t see the blades because they’re moving too fast. But the moment you stick your fingers (or, preferably, the fingers of someone you don’t like) into it, you know precisely where they are.

Crudely, in terms of quantum physics you’ve “collapsed the wave function” — you’ve turned that ‘cloud’ of fan blades into to blade in a specific location: your finger.

Electrons work sort of the same way. Like the spinning blades, they’re everywhere at once and they can interact with anything in their area. But the moment they interact, they’re in a specific location.

I just thought it was a useful analogy is all.

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


katrina says:

i think that your site is okay but i was looking for more pictures on what it looked like and more on how he figured out what it was and how he thought of it. thanks!

March 7th, 2006 at 9:45 AM

Jeneba Lansana says:

Great analogy.I was expecting a diagrammatic explanation on how the electrons move around the nucleus.

April 20th, 2006 at 12:59 AM

Andrew says:

Thanks, Jeneba. It’s weird stuff. You might even say that the electrons don’t move around the nucleus, they simply *are* around the nucleus.

The fan analogy isn’t perfect because the blades aren’t everywhere at once; they’re just moving. But it at least gives a general feel for it.

April 20th, 2006 at 9:50 AM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by