Woodsy was nothing more than a government propaganda tool. Your tax dollars subsidizing the media. Besides, Dubya needs that money so big oil can tell us that large quantities of C02 are good for us, global warming isn’t real, and Macs are better than PCs.
January 16th, 2007 at 11:44 PM
Leland says:
I liked Woodsy.
But in response to Gnomic, it’s about time someone went after the hysterical junk science most ecological activists use. Wasn’t it in the 1960s scientists were telling us all the CO2 was going to cause a new ice age?
January 17th, 2007 at 11:49 AM
JazePentz says:
The old Woodsy looks way cooler than the new. The new one looks way too generic. Don’t know what CO2 is gonna do to me and I personally don’t care but we need to watch out with our CFC’s. This global warming crap is seriously screwing us up. I have seen some effects in my limited time here. We need more education on this stuff earlier on. The old Woodsy looks like he would get more attention from children than the new. I will pledge $20.00 toward a new costume of the old design if I could get some assurance that it would go directly toward that cause.
January 23rd, 2007 at 10:16 PM
The owner of this blog makes no
representation as to the accuracy of the comments posted below. The opinions
expressed are strictly those of the commenter and may or may not reflect the
owner's. Comments are not edited (except in rare occasions by request and where
noted), but may be removed at the blog owner's discretion. See Title V, Section 230(c)(1) of the Telecommunications Act of
1996.
Weigh in
Popular Stuff
Legal Rights of Photographers
A clear explanation of what it's legal to shoot and publish.
gnomic says:
Woodsy was nothing more than a government propaganda tool. Your tax dollars subsidizing the media. Besides, Dubya needs that money so big oil can tell us that large quantities of C02 are good for us, global warming isn’t real, and Macs are better than PCs.