More on Julie Amero

Published 2/23/07

My USA Today column this week is on Julie Amero, who I wrote about before. The column goes into more detail, though.

Which of these scenarios makes more sense to you?

Scenario A: In the middle of class, a substitute teacher decided to surf for thumbnail-size porn images (an analysis of the hard drive showed that’s all that ever appeared on the screen — tiny pictures).

Scenario B: A classroom computer running Windows 98 with outdated anti-virus software, no Internet filter, and no anti-spyware software began displaying popups after some kids visited the wrong site.

Assistant State’s Attorney David Smith believed Scenario A, despite the ease of verifying Scenario B by checking the computer for adware and Trojans.

And check out the even more detailed report at the Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use. (PDF)

FYI: Here’s Julie and her husband. Look at her — an obvious porn addict and felon if ever I saw one.

http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/070213/070213_teacherporn_hmed_12p.hmedium.jpg

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


Jeff St Real says:

This whole story is terrifying to me, and now that I see they are putting Mrs. Claus on trial, it upsets me even more.

February 23rd, 2007 at 10:23 AM

marvin says:

She should be tried by that judge in Florida ( the ex-cab driver). Maybe he could put some sense into the prosecutor.

February 23rd, 2007 at 4:43 PM

The Albatross says:

Heh. Yeah… um righty oh…. like you can just look people and tell.
All that stuff about “looking” like a duck?
It’s bullshit.
If it wasn’t bullshit then there would be no Jeffrey Dahlmers.

Reality check: Jeffrey Dahlmers exist.

What do we learn from this?

You can’t just “look” at people and tell.

As ever, thanks for the gross oversimplification Andy K…
Nice to see you’re if nothing else, consistent.

February 23rd, 2007 at 9:05 PM

The Albatross says:

If you’re gonna bother bringing it up on a blog… let’s not be glib.
Not only is it boring and shallow, it is a close relative of “canned laughter” and in your case predictable to a fault.

February 23rd, 2007 at 9:08 PM

Leland says:

Great article Andrew. That really does sum it up.

February 23rd, 2007 at 9:11 PM

Jouley says:

I kind of think that Julie looks a little like Karen.

February 23rd, 2007 at 10:26 PM

The Albatross says:

I wonder if you could look at Charles and tell or not.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2900174&page=1

February 23rd, 2007 at 11:27 PM

Andrew says:

Albatross —

It was a joke, her not looking like a criminal. A joke. And dag nab it, I can be as glib as I want on my own blog! :-P

February 24th, 2007 at 9:20 AM

sasquatch says:

I think she looks like a criminal. And so does he. They’re all criminals!

February 24th, 2007 at 10:12 AM

Andrew says:

Hmm… coming from a guy named “sasquatch,” I’m not sure how to take that. ;-)

February 24th, 2007 at 11:36 AM

Rafael says:

As a software developer, knowing the very intricacies of Microsoft products, this is extremely depressing. The column wasn’t clear enough — is the teacher currently in jail? What’s the current status of the teacher?

February 24th, 2007 at 3:07 PM

Mark says:

Fact: If it was a Mac instead of a Windows PC, none of this would have happened.

The majority of the world made a terrible decision by consigning themselves to the personal computing dark ages (Windows).

This is what you get when you settle; when you pretend “good enough” is acceptable.

Thankfully, the world’s now beginning to correct that mistake. The educated are switching to Macs in droves now. The rest of the greta unwashed sheep will soon follow along in their usual mindless fashion.

February 25th, 2007 at 8:40 AM

Leland says:

And Mark posted this twice just to make sure we all know it. ;)

February 25th, 2007 at 8:49 AM

Rafael says:

Fact: There aren’t enough Mac users (cough 4%) to be targeted by mainstream malware/hacker attention, giving zealots (not to be confused with respectful users), like Mark, the false impression that the platform is much more secure…

February 25th, 2007 at 12:30 PM

Emily says:

Fact:
Rafael, if the Mac’s better security is a false impression, “mainstream malware/hacker[s]” would no doubt attack the platform just to prove there is a false impression. You underestimate the ego that drives these “people” to do what they do.

February 25th, 2007 at 3:00 PM

GaryL says:

Hey Mark you sound like a cool dood. Hows about we play some cool 3d games sometime? WAIT YOU CAN’T CAUSE YOU HAVE A MAC!!!!

PC > MAC

Seriously.. What can a Mac do that a PC can’t?

February 26th, 2007 at 2:13 AM

sasquatch says:

Since he sees it necessary to post on both threads:

Mark, you’re off topic, and you’ve missed the point. Pretty typical of Mac fanatics.

February 26th, 2007 at 9:09 AM

badman says:

leave it to a mac fanboy to go off topic and find an excuse to praise his mac…
wait, i’m off topic too, forget i said that…

That is one crazy story. Isn’t there anyone in the justice system with enough brains to realize there is something seriously wrong with what’s happening with Julie Amero? And stop the nonsense, waste of taxes, and the mental anguish caused on the victim that the trial will cause? –assuming what Andrew wrote was completely true…

February 27th, 2007 at 8:41 PM

badman says:

leave it to a mac fanboy to go off topic and find an excuse to argue that mac is better than windows…
wait, i’m off topic too, forget i said that…

That is one crazy story. Isn’t there anyone in the justice system with enough brains and influence to realize there is something seriously wrong with what’s happening with Julie Amero? And stop the nonsense, waste of taxes, and the mental anguish caused on the victim that the trial will cause?

February 27th, 2007 at 8:48 PM

glurgle says:

Gives new meaning to the term ‘Criminal Justice’ don’t it?

February 27th, 2007 at 8:50 PM

gnomic says:

It seems that the lesson of the Persecutor in the Duke lacrosse case hasn’t been learned by this Florida prosecutor… yet. This is right up there with the criminalization of 1st graders for sexual harassment.

February 27th, 2007 at 11:37 PM

Mark says:

The fact remains: If it was a Mac instead of a Windows PC, none of this would have happened.

February 28th, 2007 at 1:44 PM

Andrew says:

Mark is correct. Had they been running Macs, this wouldn’t have happened.

Had they been running Spybot Search & Destroy this wouldn’t have happened either. Plus Spybot’s free and its users aren’t cultists.

February 28th, 2007 at 1:49 PM

Donald says:

The article mentions “free anti-adware software”. In fact, institutional use of Ad-Aware, Spybot Search & Destroy (the free anti-adware software I’m aware of) requires the purchase of a licence:

http://www.safer-networking.ie/en/prices/index.html
http://www.lavasoftusa.com/products/select_your_product_academic.php

March 12th, 2007 at 4:23 PM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by