Tossing a lawyer into the mix

Published 5/18/07

So I went to see my attorney today. It was actually about something else (updating my will to reflect a life-insurance change, if you care), but while I was there I asked whether he handles things like personal/business cases. I also mentioned slander.

Well what do you know, he does. (It’s not his primary practice, but there are other lawyers in the firm if it comes to that.)

I’m not going to say anymore at the moment, but I left the office with a smile on my face and some paperwork in my hand.

(Oh, and for you language nitpickers out there: A lawyer is someone who practices law. When one is representing you, s/he is your attorney.)

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


Troy says:

This gets better each day

May 18th, 2007 at 1:30 PM

greyrat says:

Hurry! I’m running out of popcorn!

Bog, I love a good drama! You’d better “win” (whatever that is defined as) though, or I’ll be absolutely crushed.

May 18th, 2007 at 1:41 PM

Dorene says:

*chuckle* You live such an interesting life. :)

May 18th, 2007 at 2:03 PM

Emily says:

I like the sound of that! It reminds me of a Penn & Teller show.

http://www.seattleweekly.com/2000-12-06/arts/shredding-the-bunny.php

May 18th, 2007 at 3:22 PM

Miranda says:

hee hee hee.

May 18th, 2007 at 4:11 PM

Valerie says:

It would have been great to “see” this via web-cam. Nothing like a camera (remember the car incident a few weeks back?) to REALLY put things in perspective!

May 18th, 2007 at 6:12 PM

Julie says:

And3rew,
Lawsuits are one big pile of not fun. Just so you know….

May 18th, 2007 at 11:01 PM

Leland says:

How do you remember all these language tidbits?

*Leland adds correct “lawyer” and “attorney” usage to his writing notes…*

May 19th, 2007 at 11:24 AM

gnomic says:

When throwing a lawyer into the mixe its best to use the “frappee” setting.

May 19th, 2007 at 11:49 AM

badman says:

The problem with lawyers is that they will usually strongly advise to sue for in an inordinate amount– this is because they want to make sure it is even worth suing at all (to cover for their own ridiculous legal fees). However, that makes the person suing look like an arse, (”he filed a 1 million dollar lawsuit just for THAT?”) and the sued look like a victim.
In my albeit limited experience, it is never good to bring a lawyer into the picture. They are primarily looking out for their own interests and dollars. Of course they are not all like that and I don’t know who you’re lawyer is, but the bad lawyers give a bad image to the remaining .001% of the good lawyers out there.

May 20th, 2007 at 8:15 AM

Leland says:

I disagree with Badman. A lawyer can keep their client from straying over that line that places the client in a losing situation.

May 20th, 2007 at 8:29 AM

lionemom says:

Badman, one has to exert one’s authority and say, well…NO, if you don’t agree with your attorney’s advice to “sue for an inordinate amount.” It may have been the suit guy (no pun intended) who said it, but it made sense when he said, “An Educated Consumer is Our Best Customer” and I believe that holds true for everything.

I tend to believe that Andrew was consulting his attorney to see what this vet who threatened to sue him could actually do. But, of course, that is just my opinion.

Your opinion is noted, but doesn’t really apply to this situation.

May 22nd, 2007 at 10:40 AM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by