Now wait just a darned minute

Published 6/29/07

I’m working on some changes to this blog — specifically, to try to give it a more solid focus. What I like to do most of all is un-spin things. Sometimes thinking about a statement or a conclusion reveals some incredible lack of logic.

Today it comes courtesy of the Pew Internet and American Life Project, an organization I have a ton of respect for. This time, though, it’s spun some data to the point of meaninglessness.

(Ooh, the Windows Live Writer spell checker was OK with “meaninglessness.” Anyway.)

The latest Pew survey is about cyberbullying. As the AP story reports:

Nearly a third of online teens say they have been harassed on the Internet, with girls and participants of social-networking sites more likely to be targets, a study finds.

Yikes, you might think — this bullying thing is getting to be a problem. Maybe it isn’t the latest reporters-trying-to-make-up-news thing.

Alas, then you read further.

[T]he most common forms of cyberbullying are publicly disclosing someone else’s private e-mail or messages, sending threatening or aggressive messages and spreading rumors online.
Pew also counts as cyberbullying the posting of an embarrassing picture of someone else without permission.

Gods, with that broad a description it’s no wonder “Thirty-two percent of online teens said they have experienced at least one of those acts.”

Combine that broad description with a poorly defined word like “aggressive,” and you have a study that basically says “A third of kids have received a mean message from someone.”

That’s bullying? When you broaden a definition so far it becomes meaningless — witness the word “hero,” which now means “Someone who we want to show our appreciation to.”

So now, per Pew, any kid who sends another kid a message that’s anything other than friendly and polite is a “cyberbully.”

Y’know, sometimes kids are mean. It sucks, but it’s life. And sometimes kids send messages that aren’t all sweetness and light. that’s the real world.

If you prevent kids from ever seeing anything but rose petals, when they get out of school they’re going to be in for a rude awakening.

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


Steve says:

I’d like to see schools, parents, and other adults recognize that the Internet and its communication tools are no more or less threatening than the others we have.

Actually, things like MySpace and AIM are in a way safer than phones and in-person communication: there’s a written record of entire conversations. You teach your kid not to randomly tell strangers your full address on the street. Why aren’t kids told the same thing about online life?

As for bullying, you’re spot-on. As I’ve pointed out, the next step is quite easy. If someone goes too far online, it’s very easy to call them out on it. It’s not like there’s no evidence, the way that a school bully might make a threatening remark on the playground or in the cafeteria.

June 29th, 2007 at 4:18 PM

Leland says:

In the old days it was the romantic note to a class mate that got all over the school. Not much has changed, it’s just more efficient now.

June 30th, 2007 at 12:58 PM

Gnomic says:

Being the smallest kid in my class, I’m all against bullies, but c’mon. Harsh words? Swaddle them in bubble wrap until they leave home? Having recently become a parent, it has opened a whole new world of over-protective, over-scheduled idiocy to me. And I’m not talking about the kids.

June 30th, 2007 at 10:44 PM

Randy says:

Andrew, I’m sooooo going to post mean words to you in comments if you don’t stop posting articles like these and then pointing out the problems with such “studies” immediately!!! :)

July 2nd, 2007 at 12:16 AM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by