The Apple Fanboy Credo

Published 6/27/07

1. There is a vast, worldwide conspiracy to destroy Apple. It includes journalists, Microsoft, and the business community in general.

2. Any attack on Apple is, in addition, a personal attack on you.  Retaliation for these attacks must be swift, personal, and based on the concept that ‘the best defense is a good offense.’ 

3. Anything not entirely favorable said about the Mac, the iPod, the iPhone, or any Apple product is an attack on Apple and a personal attack on all Macintosh users. (See #2.)

4. Anything positive said about a competitor to the Mac, the iPod, the iPhone, or any Apple product is an attack on Apple and a personal attack on all Macintosh users; it must be met with an immediate counterattack that stresses the quality of the Mac compared to the PC regardless of what the original products were. (See #2 and #11.)

5. Leaving Apple or an Apple product out of any discussion to which it can be related (e.g., the graphical user interface, MP3 players) is an attack on Apple and a personal attack on all Macintosh users, no matter what the topic of the discussion. (See #2.)

6. Aside from the staff at Mac-related publications, e.g., MacWorld, the only journalists who know anything about computers are Walt Mossberg and David Pogue. (Note: “Knowing something about computers” is synonymous with loving and praising the Mac.)

7. Whenever in a discussion with the other kind of journalist, it is important to remind him/her that he/she can’t hold a candle to them.

8. The superiority of the iPod is clearly demonstrated by its popularity. The inferiority of Windows is clearly demonstrated by its popularity.

9. No one could possibly use Windows by choice; they must do so because they don’t know any better. It’s important to educate them about the Mac as frequently and as loudly as possible.

10. It’s important to bring up viruses, Trojans, and spyware whenever discussing Windows or the Mac. Ignoring the existence of anti-virus and anti-spyware software for the PC (and the fact that it updates itself automatically), is permissible.

11. Anything good about Windows was done by Apple first. If someone likes a particular Windows program or feature, it’s a good idea remind them of Apple’s precedence — and to point out how foolish they are for liking the Windows version. This does not apply to the two-button mouse.

12. Every discussion of any Apple product must always be brought back to how much better the Mac is than a Windows PC, regardless of the original subject.

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


Steve says:

It may be a maddening thing that 1st-gen applications like the iPhone are as flawed as they are innovative, but the money Apple makes off of all the 1st-generation iPods/iPhones is what funds the fixes for the 2nd and subsequent versions.

It’s basically a problem where you’ve gotta have a few million people beta test it for a year or two before you can make the improvements - and as a corporation, Apple can’t beta test hardware the way software can be tested.

Thankfully, there are many Apple ‘fanboys’ that will absolutely shell out these development costs.

June 27th, 2007 at 8:16 PM

Andrew says:

I thought Apple products were perfect out of the box, first time. :)

Someone asked me today why I hate Apple products. I replied that I didn’t — in fact, I like a lot of them (although that doesn’t mean I like them enough to shell out the extra money to buy ‘em). I just don’t think they’re perfect.

What annoys me are the Apple fanboys who send me screaming tirades every time I say something less than glowing about an Apple product. Hence this credo.

June 27th, 2007 at 9:43 PM

Jonathan says:

That is funny. Somewhat true, which makes it even funnier ;-).

June 27th, 2007 at 9:57 PM

Andrew says:

Oh, just wait. It’ll get picked up somewhere and then the ranting will begin. Always does. :)

June 27th, 2007 at 10:46 PM

Rayne Van-Dunem says:

You might want to add to #2 that even if any criticism of an Apple product is made known and published by a Mac blog, it should also be considered as a psy-ops by covert Microsoft fans posing as Apple bloggers.

Exhibit A: The response to an offer of an iPhone-free RSS feed from TUAW
http://www.tuaw.com/2007/06/22/iphone-free-tuaw-feed/#comments

Exhibit B: The response to a criticism of the transparent menubar in Leopard:
http://www.tuaw.com/2007/06/17/leopards-new-menubar-is-hideous/#comments

No. You must never, ever criticize an Apple decision.
EVAR.

June 27th, 2007 at 11:31 PM

greyrat says:

u r all lusers!!! loonix 4 evar!!!!

I find all stances like this — OS zealotry in particular — to be unbelievably silly. After all, all operating systems suck.

June 28th, 2007 at 7:28 AM

gnomic says:

There are a lot of geeks and nerds - macboys and linuxgeeks alike - that are breaking the first commandment.

Its just a piece of overpriced hardward and crappy software with a gee-whiz interface. At least they didn’t steal this user interface from Palo Alto.

June 28th, 2007 at 10:05 AM

Jonathan says:

Lots of Apple nay sayers around these parts. Ironically, people that do switch to the Mac usually hold true to what he has written. The nay sayers are (generally speaking) people that are ignorant of the Mac. Most have never used a Mac except for back in 1984 and have never had the time nor the opportunity to enjoy what so many of of have the privilege of working on each day. As they say, “Ignorance is Bliss”.

Mac fans celebrate the Macintosh with zealotry. Windows fans celebrate Windows by making fun of Mac fan boys & girls.

June 28th, 2007 at 10:39 AM

Andrew says:

I liken the Mac, as I said in my Roanoke Times story, to a Bentley. It’s a lot nicer than what’s out there, but it’s questionable whether it’s worth it for most people to spend the money for the “luxury.”

Would I like a high-end iMac? You betcha! I would also love a Bentley. But in both cases I don’t feel the need for one because what I have (2.8-GHz PC, Camry) is terrific for my needs.

Now if, say, 4 percent of people were Bentley owners and they were constantly deriding non-Bentley people for owning “sub-standard” cars, they’d be pretty annoying, especially to people who said, correctly, “I don’t need a Bentley, thanks.”

Sure, the zealotry makes sense; you own a great machine and are willing to pay a premium for it. Me, I love my Camry.

June 28th, 2007 at 10:45 AM

Jonathan says:

Honestly, these days Macs aren’t THAT much more of a luxury, sans MacBook Pro. That machine I think IS over priced. The MacPro machines are fantastic and very competitive with competing Dells. Since we are using the car analogy, think of the Mac as a luxury car that rides like a lexus (OS X), but can pull a trailer behind it (Windows). Mac Mini, Macbook, iMac are all priced with not much of a premium over competing machines. A couple hundred bucks maybe, but being that it can tow that trailer, it makes it much more versatile than a standard Sedan, for those times when you need to use that trailer. Not even taking hardware design or supplied software, that alone makes it enough for me to justify that small premium.

When I spent $1200 for my iMac Core Duo, it was like I had just bought two brand new machines. Sitting next to me I have my PC Tower on the floor, and I truly haven’t turned it on since April of 2006. Maybe I should see if it still works…

Do you ever see those teenagers & 20 somethings that can’t afford a vehicle with the chrome rims, so they take their Chevy Cavalier and put he spinning hubcaps on them? I always think of that when my friends show me their souped up PCs.

It’s pointless to have the Mac VS PC conversation in general. But we as Mac users are passionate about it because we really love our machines. I never ever loved my PC that much. My Commodore Amiga, absolutely. PC - never.

Do I want people to switch over to the Mac? I do for some people, when I think it’s right for them. Others, no, they can keep driving their Camry. It’s reliable, but I’d much rather take that long daily commute in a Bentley. Mac owners are part of an exclusive club, and when you let everyone in, it’s just not as elite anymore and loses some appeal.

June 28th, 2007 at 11:42 AM

Emily says:

So, Andrew, are you saying that a Mac would be the choice when money is no object?

June 28th, 2007 at 11:59 AM

Emily says:

I think you’re barking up the wrong tree trying to bait the Mac fans. As I recall, in the recent past, you’ve gotten the biggest reaction out of the iPod cult. I guess it’s possible that all the furor is coming from that 4% of the portable music player owners that might also be Mac owners, but it doesn’t seem likely to me.

Like BMW owners, Mac people seem content to be part of that elite 5% of the market.

June 28th, 2007 at 12:58 PM

Andrew says:

> So, Andrew, are you saying that a Mac
> would be the choice when money is no object?

Hmm… good question. To keep the analogy going, that’s like asking if a Bentley is the best car when money is no object. If I could afford any car I wanted, I probably wouldn’t get one.

So the answer is “It depends.” Do you have a lot of PC knowledge that would become less useful if you switched — you know, the tricks for tweaking and customizing your system? Is there some software you really need that’s only available on a PC? Do you like tinkering, maybe messing around with new hardware? Do you like games?

Asking if a Mac is “the choice” if money was no object is like asking what city would be the best to live in. It all depends what you need and want.

June 28th, 2007 at 1:47 PM

Steve says:

Here’s a question - is it possible to strip a Mac of all the pretty graphics and to update your hardware by hand?

I run a stripped-down version of Windows XP (do wish it was offered like that out of a box!) with merely ‘good’ hardware that runs better than most PCs or Macs at twice the price. I’m not sure you can just go in and tinker with the registry on a Mac the way you can on a PC. Of course, if I wanted the ultimate in tinkering I’d have Linux, but it’s nice to be able to choose which built-in features I want.

The other thing I like is that I can do basically whatever I want with the hardware, update/upgrade when I like, and so on.

Then again, my dream car is my ‘62 Baja Beetle…

June 28th, 2007 at 2:28 PM

Fred says:

What upsets you, Andy, is that your so-called “knowledge” would be virtually useless if you used a Mac. You are wasting your time with Windows. It’s just inferior to Mac OS X. Windows is and always has been behind Mac - sometimes by just a few years, sometimes by over a decade. Learn your history and see someone about your raging case oF Stockholm Syndrome.

June 29th, 2007 at 12:10 AM

Andrew says:

Thanks for your kind words, Freddy. I appreciate your making my point for me.

June 29th, 2007 at 10:11 AM

David Pogue says:

First of all, I can’t agree more about Apple fanboys. They descend on me, they descend on EVERY columnist. You can’t use the word “Mac” without getting an Inbox full.

However, your #6 bothers me:

“the only journalists who know anything about computers are Walt Mossberg and David Pogue. (Note: “Knowing something about computers” is synonymous with loving and praising the Mac.)”

I really am not a kneejerk Apple fanboy, and I have no problem criticizing Apple where it’s due. Maybe you and I criticize to different degrees, but Apple never gets a free ride from me.

I’ve assembled a few examples from my recent reviews here:

http://www.davidpogue.com/bio_photos/fanboy.html

I’d love to know what you think after sampling that list…

–David Pogue

October 10th, 2007 at 12:08 AM

Jonathan says:

This list clearly shows that David Pogue is not a ‘fanboy’. Recently, he was one of the leaders that called out Apple regarding the iPhone price cut. Does he make supplementary income by writing a Missing Manual series for Macs? He sure does. Darn good ones. I’ve heard some pundits criticize him for that, because they say he endorses Apple so he can sell more books. Those people must forget that he also writes equivalent books for Windows Vista..(although he does make some incredibly witty jabs about how Vista is copying the Mac) :-).

Andrew, if Steve Jobs would request your presence at every Apple event, I have a hunch you would go. Walt & David are the top tier, so that makes them easy targets to label as ‘fanboys’.

October 10th, 2007 at 8:34 PM

Andrew says:

Um, I didn’t label either of them as fanboys.

October 10th, 2007 at 8:36 PM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by