Bittorrent routes around Comcast

Published 2/18/08

I wrote already that I was happy to be Comcast-free in large part because I don’t think Comcast should be telling me what I’m allowed to use the Internet for (any more than my phone company has the right to tell me what I can say to the people I call).

Comcast, for those who missed it, has a policy of restricting Bittorrent traffic. Bittorrent is a terrific way for sharing large files, because it spreads the pain of delivering those files among lots of people. If you want to download demos of new games, or a version of Linux, Bittorrent is the way to go.

But it’s also used for music and movie piracy, so Comcast decided to limit all Bittorrent traffic by essentially flooding Bittorrent users’ connections with bogus data.

When accused of this, first the company denied it. (I.e., it flat-out lied.) Then the Associated Press, the EFF, and some others proved it was being done. The the FCC started an investigation. Now Comcast is defending the practice it said it wasn’t engaged in.

Ergo, screw them.

To paraphrase John Gilmore, the Internet interprets this kind of bullshit as damage and routes around it. In this case, per TorrentFreak:

Several BitTorrent developers have joined forces to propose a new protocol extension with the ability to bypass the BitTorrent interfering techniques used by Comcast and other ISPs.

It amazes me on a regular basis that companies and organizations think they really can stop a large number of users from doing what they want to. There comes a point where companies have to realize where the river is going and then realize they have to work with that flow.

At times, Bittorrent accounts for something like 25 to 30 percent of all Internet traffic. Think about that. Comcast really thought it could throttle that kind of usage? Clearly users want Bittorrent, and interfering with it would only mean those users would come up with a way around Comcast’s roadblocks.

The future, to any reasonable person, was obvious; Comcast wouldn’t stop it for long, and it would generate a lot of bad press in the meantime.

Every now and again you read a story about, say, a teacher who suspends a student for leaving class to talk to his father in Iraq. We all know how that will end up — outcry, apology, embarrassment — and I wonder why the teacher couldn’t see the obvious. Ditto for Comcast. Did it really think it would get away with this for long?

Probably. The music industry still hasn’t learned its lesson. It continues to sue its customers while not providing them what they obviously want: unprotected music they can play wherever they want to. And then it’s shocked — shocked — that vastly more music is acquired by piracy than legally.

A few quotes from Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching are appropriate:

If you overvalue possessions,
people begin to steal.

and

If you don’t trust the people,
you make them untrustworthy.

and finally

Throw away morality and justice,
and people will do the right thing.
Throw away industry and profit,
and there won’t be any thieves.
If these three aren’t enough,
just stay at the center of the circle
and let all things take their course.

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


Randy says:

You know this post will invariably lead to *someone* pointing out that what people are doing is illegal, and Comcast has an obligation to try to stop it. Thing is, yes it is illegal, and no people shouldn’t be doing it. However, Comcast not only has no obligation to try to stop it, but given the laws in this country, probably faces increased liability in case of a lawsuit by the movies and music that are being illegally downloaded.

I agree that people shouldn’t be downloading illegal content, but that is an issue for the content providers to deal with (as they have done soooo unsuccesfully to date) and law enforcement.

February 18th, 2008 at 10:06 AM

Andrew says:

Bittorrent is certainly not illegal. While it can be used for illegal things, so can FTP or even e-mail. In fact, Bittorrent is used for a lot of legal stuff, and Comcast makes no distinction.

I often use Bittorrent to download game demos, which can run into the hundreds of megs — or more. If I had Comcast I wouldn’t be able to do that.

February 18th, 2008 at 10:13 AM

Trae says:

The strangest thing about the whole Bittorrent being used for illegal activities is that one of the oldest internet protocols (NNTP) is being used illegally at a scale similar to the Bittorrent’s illegal activity. Usenet activity has jumped in recent years, and I guarrentee it’s not being used for legit message board style activities. But…because Usenet is old technology and out of the public eye it is not being pursued.

I agree with Randy in that ISPs need to wash their hands of the illegal activity and redirect litigation. It’s not the ISPs obligation to protect/filter illegal content, and if they do start then they become liable for everything that escapes their filter. It’s bad business, and I don’t know what they are thinking.

The entertainment industy should try to protect their content, but only now are they realizing if they stimulate the consumer’s needs/wants they will be profitable while keeping control of their property.

February 18th, 2008 at 11:18 AM

Randy says:

I wasn’t clear, and I apologize. I know bittorrent isn’t illegal. I didn’t read the articles to which you linked. The *last* thing I read about the whole affair was that Comcast was claiming some impossibly gifted AI algorithm which detected illegal torrent downloads and only interfered with those. Based on this understanding of what went on, then the people doing these illegal downloads are indeed out-of-order, but it is not Comcast’s responsibility to deal with that problem unless they want to expose themselves to greater legal liability. Hopefully that’s a little more clear on what I intended to say.

February 18th, 2008 at 5:01 PM

Andrew says:

No worries, Randy — I just get a little jumpy sometimes when I think people assume that all Bittorrent stuff is illegal.

Of course, most of what Bittorrent is used for is illegal, but that’s besides the point. ;-)

February 18th, 2008 at 5:37 PM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by