A late congratulations

Published 4/15/08

Kudos, props, etc., to the staff of the Washington Post for winning the 2008 Pulitzer Prize “for its exceptional, multi-faceted coverage of the deadly shooting rampage at Virginia Tech, telling the developing story in print and online.”

The Post also won the Virginia Press Association’s awards for its coverage of the shooting for both “Spot news writing” and “General news writing,” and scored a “Best in show” for is coverage as well: “Clearly the best writing over the entire event. A model of breadth, depth, clarity and sensitivity. This story was a local one for The Post and every other newspaper in Virginia. It was beautifully done.”

But extra kudos go to the Christiansburg-Blacksburg News-Messenger. The tiny, local paper took both first and second place in the VPA’s “Special sections or special editions” category for its extended coverage of the Tech tragedy. (Let’s get some names in here: Tonya Hall Bowyer, Amanda Bolen, and Lawson Koeppel.)

new_virginia_tech0416And finally, Alan Kim of the Roanoke Times — whom I’ve worked with and I know to be an absolutely terrific guy — took the VPA’s Best in Show award for this shot (at least I think it’s this shot) in the aftermath of the shooting.

I have to say, though, that I’m disappointed that the single best source of breaking news during the shooting — I was in the Roanoke Times newsroom at the time — was omitted. that was Planet Blacksburg, a student-run news site. It was where we turned to find out what was happening because it had all the information first.

The site got new media — it understood that it’s not about having photos and video and multimedia fluff, but it’s being willing to report rumor and unverified information as such. In a situation like that, waiting for confirmation on every piece of data would have been the wrong move — the old media move.

As long as readers knew the information was unconfirmed and may be revised, during chaos like that it’s best to get everything out there. Detailed, confirmed reporting could wait for the next day’s papers or for the evening news. But the Web can’t work like that, and the folks at Planet Blacksburg knew it. Bravo to them.

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


Admiral says:

WSLS 10 has won one of those awards for the killings at VT and will not shut up about it.

Winning an award for covering a mass killing is a bit odd to me. Its like saying “Hey, there was a mass killing in your area and you showed it on your local news! Good Job!” Just a bit off…

April 15th, 2008 at 1:24 PM

Admiral says:

Made a mistake they won a Peabody Award. As in Mr Peabody.

http://media.movieweb.com/news/09.2006/peabody.jpg

April 15th, 2008 at 1:34 PM

tommy says:

it does seems strange for giving an award for ‘ambulance chasing’ but these awards are supposed to be for the quality of the reporting.

Some principles have to be contradictory in order to get some good reporting. How a news org handles balancing those principles and then producing balanced, well-rounded and informative reoporting is what gets them those awards. Being there first can be a factor as well.

Now: Bragging about winning a pulitzer prize for reporting on the WTC for instance would be in bad taste, IMO.

April 18th, 2008 at 7:36 AM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by