Gainful employment

Published 4/18/08

I’ve been going the freelance route, doing work for Computerworld, some trade pubs, Kiplingers, even Women’s Day (!).

A couple of weeks ago, though, our Realtor in Roanoke called. “I was in a car with some people I work with,” she explained. “And one of them said, ‘I just lost my writer. Anyone know any writers?’ And I told him yes, I did. ‘In Richmond?’ Yep, in Richmond.”

So I called, had a couple of interviews, and now I’ve got a job. And it’s not just as a writer — despite the title, it’s really an editor-in-chief position at a trade magazine, something I’ve done before.

The great thing about it: At the moment it’s long-term freelance, which gives them a chance to try me out, gives me a chance to see if I like being an editor again (I suspect I will), and can eventually lead to a full- or part-time office position.

Right now we’re still undecided whether I should be working full-time or not, so this is the perfect way to test out the work/Sam balancing act.

And the icing on the cake: These folks are very, very into new media. And they don’t just pay it lip service, or think that throwing a few videos on a Web site makes them cutting edge. They’re experimenting with member-driven blogs, Webcasts, message boards, a strong print-Web connection, Twitter and Facebook, and anything else they can think of.

In other words, they aren’t (like some places) doing “new media” because someone told them “this is the future.” They’re doing it because they see it as a great tool for connecting to their members. And when your attitude is “media as a tool” you do a lot better than when your attitude is “media for media’s sake.”

I start next week, and I’m looking forward to working with a company that really gets the whole Internet/social media thing.

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


Admiral says:

Your forgot to mention who you are working for…

April 18th, 2008 at 7:47 PM

tommy says:

congrats! I hope it goes well!

I, for one, am spoiled, but not complacent, having held only two jobs since 1990. every day i feel like i’ll be the next one to go. that’s not bragging - i live in fear almost every day. not a good way to live.

but, the good thing about having been in one (or two) place(s) for so long is that I get to see from first-hand experience that outsourcing a skillset to india or china requires more intensive management skills, better knowledge about the task to be done (at a management level) and also there’s that thing about crossing the language barrier (duh - they speak different languages in other countries).

hope all goes well…

April 19th, 2008 at 1:10 AM

Admiral says:

“every day i feel like i’ll be the next one to go. that’s not bragging - i live in fear almost every day. not a good way to live.”

You sir are a good American! Fear is a good way to control you. The more you are fearful of silly things the more you can be controlled. Free yourself, because life is too short to be fearful.

April 19th, 2008 at 8:04 PM

AG says:

What Tommy said re living in fear on the unemployment front. Another thing I fear? Having a freelancer with a ginormous project on his plate go suddenly, extremely unavailable…

April 20th, 2008 at 1:29 AM

Admiral says:

I doubt I could do freelance work. The uncertainty makes it hard to make long term plans in my opinion. But, I can understand why someone would be a freelance. The illusion of more freedom could be enticing.

And if you give a freelance a “ginormous” project and they go “extremely unavailable” then I doubt I would ever use that freelance again. I can also see the side of the employer as having a freelance worker means that the employer usually only pays for the work done kinda like commission. This creates an illusion that the employer will save money. But, this also has uncertainties that make it hard to predict the future. Having unreliable freelancers would stress me to no end. I would no doubt hire permanent workers for the long run. This works best in my opinion as the illusion of job security would increase both the bosses and workers productivity.

April 20th, 2008 at 7:15 AM

Randy says:

Maybe Andrew hasn’t said yet who this is because he doesn’t want us using insider knowledge to buy up loads of stock prior to the stratospheric valuation increase sure to follow from Andrew’s participation with said company???

April 20th, 2008 at 10:27 AM

Admiral says:

Perhaps you are correct. So says the magic 8-ball.

April 20th, 2008 at 10:32 AM

Steve says:

The arrangement you have now is how I got my current job. Apparently, there are IRS rules about how much 1099 income you can get from one company for the same job you usually do before they HAVE to hire you. I can email it if you want; I don’t have more details at the moment.

I prefer doing both the full-time gig and a little bit of freelance on the side. It can be pretty stressful sometimes, but I don’t budget any money from freelance so it is just bonus every time I get it.

Re: tied to a job —
http://www.standtallforamerica.com/page/s/careyoukeep

Congrats on the new job.

April 20th, 2008 at 10:44 AM

Andrew says:

I’ll give details at some point, but for now I want to keep it generic.

And Angela, this was recent and quick — it didn’t interfere with my work for you. Talk to Bev. [sigh]

April 20th, 2008 at 4:42 PM

braine says:

Congratulations!

April 22nd, 2008 at 10:24 PM

Chuck Staples says:

Sincere congratulations and good luck.

Cheers!

May 3rd, 2008 at 12:40 AM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by