Did NASA suppress climate-change info? Yes and no

Published 7/11/08

I would not have been at all surprised to find that the Bush administration tried to suppress NASA scientists who were writing about climate change. They have a long and storied history of being vehemently anti-science. But the official NASA report on the issue is a bit more complicated.

From the executive summary:

Our investigation found that during the fall of 2004 through early 2006, the NASA Headquarters Office of Public Affairs managed the topic of climate change in a manner that reduced, marginalized, or mischaracterized climate change science made available to the general public through those particular media over which the Office of Public Affairs had control (i.e., news releases and media access).

A-ha! you say — just as I thought! (In fact, that was exactly what I thought as I read that.) But then you go a bit further:

We also concluded that the climate change editorial decisions were localized within the NASA Headquarters Office of Public Affairs; we found no credible evidence suggesting that senior NASA or Administration officials directed the NASA Headquarters Office of Public Affairs to minimize information relating to climate change.

So that’s a little better. Whether the OPA officials tried to suppress that information because it went against their personal views, or because they thought they were doing the administration a favor, or because they thought it helped their career paths… well, we may never know.

I hope, though, that the people who did that aren’t able to work in any kind of science-related field. Maybe the yokels at the creationism museum are hiring.

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


Admiral says:

NASA (sadly) is a crapfest of bureaucracy. What do you think happened to Challenger, Columbia? When an organization places political interest above science it fails miserably.

July 11th, 2008 at 1:02 PM

gnomic says:

What this fails to point out is that the white house hired acolytes like the tool that is currently runninjg NASA into the ground (literally and figeratively) and he hired the moron (probably from Falwell’s Liberty U) that was doing the censorship.

Impeachment is too good for them. They should be torn into itsy bitsy pieces and buried alive.

July 11th, 2008 at 6:22 PM

tommy says:

the boss is always inherently complicit. just because there’s no record of the higher-ups telling anyone to suppress info, if it was done, the higher-ups, as well as the ones who actually suppressed info are guilty and need to go, and they need to be punished.

it would appropriate to sit them for a month in a pit, up to their necks in diesel soot, or better yet: the first pressing of all the oil (unrefined) we’ll extract from any new offshore drilling which occurs as a result of the recent poopstorm.

except of course that will take like 10 years and they’ll only get like a tablespoon of crude out of all work…

July 18th, 2008 at 2:18 AM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by