Spore getting lousy reviews

Published 9/8/08

So the long-awaited game Spore was released in the U.S. today, and it’s getting lousy reviews — an average of fewer than two stars on Amazon.

spore Why? Two reasons. First, the game’s DRM (digital restrictions management) is, in the words of several reviewers, “draconian.” You must lower your computer’s security settings to install it, and are allowed to put it on a maximum of three computers. So if you replace your PC, or get a new hard drive, or simply want to install it on a different computer in your house, you use up one of those three installs.

Further, as has been pointed out, there’s no guarantee that the servers at Electronic Arts that are required for installation will still be working in, say, three or five years. So you’re renting the game — for a good long time, for sure, but it’s still a rental.

And if you need a fourth install? You have to call EA and hope to convince them to give you another code. How nice.

But that’s not all. Not only is the DRM a major problem, but apparently the gameplay has also been dumbed down.

As reviewer Erich Maria Remarque wrote:

Evolution doesn’t even matter anymore. You can add as many legs to a creature as you want, but it won’t be any faster than a one legged creature with higher leg stats. “Creating” your creatures is pointless (cosmetic only, because everything is based on stats), and brings you about the same excitement as dressing up a plastic doll.

My advice? If you want Spore, buy a copy, but also download one of the cracked versions that are already available — versions that don’t have EA’s nasty activation system. That way EA gets its money, but you own a game that doesn’t rely on the company’s good graces to play.

Add to del.icio.us Digg it! Add to Technorati Add to Furl Add to reddit Stumble it!

The Fray


Admiral says:

Advocating illegal activity.. hmmm. I love your comedy.

September 8th, 2008 at 3:02 PM

gnomic says:

Admiral,

Technically, since you own a license to the game, you are violating the licensing agreement, not breaking a law, a contractual issue, not one of law, and therefor not illegal per se. And since the DRM restrictions are “excessive” and DRM is not intented to restrict the use of the licensed product, there is a good, if costly, defense to this approach.

However, a better approach might be to not buy a bad game. Despite all the hype, its not getting very good ratings. Let it die an ignoble death, then when you pirate it, no one will care since they can’t afford a lawyer to sue anyone.

September 8th, 2008 at 3:15 PM

Steve says:

If the evolution of it doesn’t matter, how is it any different from Command and Conquer or a million other RTS games?

Wasn’t the evolution the point of the game??

September 9th, 2008 at 2:50 PM

Admiral says:

A poor justification for an illegal activity does not make the activity legal.

If you do not agree with the DRM then do not buy it.

I highly doubt your justification will hold up in any court.

September 10th, 2008 at 3:01 AM

Andrew says:

It’s not a justification, it’s the law. If you pay for the game, you own the right to use it. If you download a copy of something you own, that’s legal.

What’s illegal is making or distributing the software used to crack the DRM. But taking advantage of that software isn’t.

So no, I wasn’t suggesting that anyone break the law.

September 10th, 2008 at 6:56 AM

gnomic says:

Admiral,

Andrews comments are correct and that is exactly how the law is written and how the courts interpret it. IF you want, I can find the citations when I have time (it may be a while) But I am an actual authority on this subject and have a bunch of professional credentials that back my statement up, so this isn’t just my usual personal opinion, its a professional one.

Doesn’t mean you won’t be sued, just that they won’t win.

And I agree that the best course of action is simply not to purchase DRM protected software and let economics punish the company. I had Lotus thrown off the purchasing contracts of several states in the ’80s for thier draconian DRM of Lotus 123 v4. And the DRM was removed in the next release, although it has creapt back in over the years.

September 10th, 2008 at 12:22 PM

gnomic says:

Oh and advocating an illegal activity isn’t illegal with a few exceptions (harming the President for example, or inciting to riot).

I think stupid people should be turned into dog food. I’d like to encourage you to do so.

Certainaly an illegal activity, but my advocating it is legal.

September 10th, 2008 at 12:25 PM

gnomic says:

Its just a bad game dispite all the PR. Ya just canke put lipstick on this pig, or the ameba that it evolved from.

September 10th, 2008 at 8:48 PM

Weigh in

Yer name:

Yer e-mail (to be notified of responses or I can respond privately -- never ever shared):

Yer Web site (if you like):

What you have to say (Be civil, or it might be removed; comments with links
might be held for moderation, just so you know):




Site created with

and


Blog run by