Enough.
Enough e-mails, phone calls and letters to the editor defending Julie
Amero. I’m sick of them. The worst part of all is that people jump to
these conclusions without viewing any of the evidence or police
documents. Here are the facts: Amero showed graphic pornography to up
to 10 children in a Kelly Middle School class, according to a police
investigation.
There was no magic, mysterious conspiracy to
arrest and convict this woman. No group of students said, “We hate this
teacher and now we’re going to ruin her life.” There were no bungling
school district administrators or evil police. Computer filters can’t
stop every one of the millions of pornography Web sites from slipping
through. Blaming the school, the police or anyone else for what Amero
did is like blaming a rape victim for being raped. It’s sick, it’s
wrong, it’s ignorant and it’s moronic. The school didn’t even bring
charges up against Amero. The police did.
According to a Norwich
police affidavit, “the pornographic sites were almost continuously
viewed from approximately 9:24 a.m. to approximately 11:11 a.m.” No one
accidentally clicks on pornographic pop-ups advertisements for nearly
two hours continuously. According to the affidavit, at least one of the
Web sites required the person viewing the images to click on a box
agreeing to terms of disclosure beforehand.
Here’s the kicker:
AMERO WAS NOT CONVICTED OF LOOKING AT PORNOGRAPHY ON A SCHOOL COMPUTER.
She was convicted of four counts of “Risk of Injury to a Minor.” That
means she was convicted of NOT DOING ENOUGH TO PREVENT CHILDREN FROM
SEEING PORNOGRAPHY ON THE COMPUTER. Now, does she deserve 40 years in
jail, of course not. She was offered probationary time, which would
lead to her not having a criminal record, and she turned it down,
according to her attorney. Now, she’s been convicted and she’ll face
her sentence in March. I’m sure the judge will use prudence.
So
even if you give Amero the benefit of the doubt, and you say the
pornography was on the computer to begin with (and she simply found it
there), then she should have covered the computer, unplugged it or
forced the students to stand in the back of the room far away from the
computer. Don’t let multiple children, all were younger than 16, see
people performing sexual acts upon each other on a school computer
screen. That’s just wrong.